The Downsides of Usability

Updated on

Obscurity

You make things easy by hiding underlying complexity. The simpler a tool, the harder it is (and the less relevant it becomes) to know how the tool works. Use increases while understanding decreases.

Friction and Meaning

When things are too easy, they lose meaning. I think this is probably a sensory matter, and I think it's correlated with satisfaction. The better you can sense an interaction, the more satisfaction you get from the interaction.

Examples:

When you can't sense an activity, you lose your sense of particpation in the activity. When you lose your sense of particiatpion, you feel less like the driver and more and more like a passenger. The driver is someone important. A passenger could be anybody.

There's something missing from a frictionless life. Maybe this is why some people prefer a fraught relationship to no relationship at all.

That said, people obviously prefer automatics to stickshifts. But I think that's because most people consider driving a necessary evil, and the people who lament the demise of the stickshift are predisposed to find driving fun.

So making things easier is good when it eliminates a necessary evil, but people disagree on what constitutes a necessary evil.

Waste

When things are easy to use, we use them more, and may consume more resources in the process. I wonder if households used a lot less water before washing machines were invented.

This is especially bad if the additional consumed resources include our own time. I read somewhere that when the washing machine was invented, housewives actually spent more time doing laundry, because they could do so much more.

So what's the lesson there? Be suspicious of products that are supposed to make your life easier. Or at least pay attention to whether they actually do.

Related Notes